WEEK 14- Chapter 16 ‘Ethical journalism: is it an oxymoron’?
1. You are a reporter and an important source invites you to dinner. The source says it is the only way you will get the information you need and insists on paying. Based on past practice, you newspaper will refuse to reimburse your costs. What do you do?
I take them to a really cheap restaurant and pay, only joking. I would pay the money, which is probably the unethical choice. It seems like a small price to pay for the possibility of a improved story. If the source does not reveal any new or relevant information I would have wasted time and money, which be a risk, I would be willing to take.
2. While the travel editor was on sick leave, you took a two-week trip to Spain, courtesy of a major airline. During the trip, the airline insisted that the resulting story be positive, and demanded the right to vet and change your copy, saying an advertising contract depended upon it. It was the worst trip of your life. What do you do?
I am not sure what I would do in this situation as just because I had a bad trip does not necessarily mean other people have had the same negative experience. However if other people have had the same dismal experience I would write the story.
3. A reliable source tells you an error in your story, which has been published in this morning’s paper. This means that you must notify the editor and compose a correction for publication. But the source is not concerned about the error and insists that this not be done. Instead they want you to write another small story, based on a new angle. Your admission of error will cost you a pay rise. What do you do?
First I would correct my error, as the ramifications that could arise later on down the track could be serious. The correction would be made to just cover all parties such as the newspaper and my sources. If the small story based on a new angle had nothing to do with my error of information, I would write the story if the information was factual. If the story was based on that error and was untrue I would refuse to write the news story as it has been formed on dishonest information.
4. You are a court reporter on a major regional newspaper. A teenager convicted of a prostitution offence approaches you. She is beside herself with emotion and says that if you write the story her parents will disown her, her friends will shun her, and worst of all, her partner – who is terminally ill, who she is supporting financially and emotionally in the last days of his life, and who thinks she works in a bank- will not be able to handle finding out how she really earns her money. Your newspaper normally reports such cases. What will you do? Why?
Well the fact she is a teenager may cause some implications such as I may not be able to publish her name. I would write the story but not reveal her identity. Hopefully this way no one knows who she is. But on the same note would this story be for the publics benefit? Probably not, in that case I would reconsider publishing the article.
Journalism Issue
Instead of writing on a journalism issue from the book, I would like to take time and reflect on CMNS1280. I would like to focus on the quiz, which I found to be very beneficial. The quiz taught me to be constantly aware of local to international issues and news. The quiz made me get into good habits by constantly listening/reading news.
Focusing back on ethical journalism i believe that no matter how much you read and inform yourself in regards to ethical practice, I think it is an area that will constantly appear 'grey' until you are actually are working in the industry. It is hard to make decisions on hypothetical situations. I think any aspiring journalists should remember when making decision, they should make decision that are not going to damage their reputation. As it takes a while to build up a good reputation within the journalism industry and one bad decision can ruin ones entire reputation.
Sunday, September 23, 2007
WEEK 13- Chapter 13 'Online news: journalism's strands converge' & Chapter 17 'Perils of Defamation'
WEEK 13- Chapter 13 ‘Online news: journalism’s strands converge & Chapter 17 ‘Perils of Defamation'
Chapter 13
1. What do media companies need to do in relation to convergence before that can expect their journalists to work in converged newsrooms?
Before media companies decide to converge the newsroom they need to provide journalist with adequate training to work across the various mediums. Media companies should consider a wide range of aspects that will affect journalists due to convergence such as having the skill level to work across the various mediums.
2. What would be the likely outcome if someone, who just wanted to work as a print journalist because they would be nervous on television, was told by the company they worked for that they must report for television as well as print?
Grin and bear it. Today in the journalism field, journalists are increasing expected to be multi skilled. A journalist will always have their strengths and weakness. The likely outcome for this journalist would either they would have to adapt or find somewhere else to work that just focuses on print journalism. Today to further ones journalism career it would be beneficial if they were multi skilled and could adapt to various mediums.
3. Is journalistic convergence just a trendy fad that will run its course then be forgotten about?
When the Internet was introduced, was it just a trendy fad, defiantly not! Just like the Internet, convergence is here to stay. Media companies are converging to cater for consumers. Convergence is a response to consumers’ demands.
5. If you had crystal ball, what would it tell you about the future of radio, television, and the web?
In the future radio, television and the web will continue to play a vital role in the way each medium delivers news. I do not think any of the mediums would be phased out, now with the introduction of digital radio and television. The Internet will continue to grow and delivery of news will be more efficient.
6. Should the idea of multi skilling be integrated into every course in university journalism studies? Why?
Mult-skilling is the future for journalist, so yes I think it would be an important area to integrate into university studies. It would educate students on the issues and skills involved in the area of multi-skilling. However, I do think the fundamental writing skills should take priority, as these skills are an essential factor in journalism.
7. Is society getting to a point where life as we know it could not survive without the Internet and web?
Only for people who rely on the web and Internet to undergo their daily functions, which is the majority of society. For some people the Internet is vital to their studies and careers. The Internet allows society to preform daily functions that would otherwise require them preform face to face or over the telephone. The Internet cuts out the middle.
Chapter 17
1. You are a newspaper editor. One of your reporters has made an honest mistake that defamed someone. You publish an apology. The person defamed is not satisfied and wants you to print a full-page feature story promoting her business or she will sue. What will you do?
I would first try and compromise with the person and hopefully we could reach some agreement. If not I would weigh up the options in taking into factor what decision would result in a bigger lose for the newspapers.
2. Would you support a ‘public figure’ defence for the media that would sharply limit the rights of public figures, ranging from premiers to cricketers and rock stars, to take out defamation suits against the media? Why?
I have mixed feelings on this question. In one why yes, because 'public figures' should understand that being a 'public' figure they are constantly going to be in the eye of the media, so they have to accept positive and negative news. On the other hand defamation cost a whole lot of money. But to keep it safe I would say no because there needs to be some limits with respecting public figures.
3. You have promised a confidential source that you will not identify her. However, you discover that what she told you is untrue. Your newspaper is sued for defamation. You try to contact the person but she has vanished. Do you reveal her identity in court? Why?
Yes, it seems that I got the shorter end of the stick. The fact that she told me was untrue doesn't leave her with a leg to stand on. However I would not go publicising it, as I would still want my other sources to trust me.
Journalism Issue
The key issue to focus on within these reading is defamation. I think point to remember is that when reporting on someone, report the truth minus you opinion. Also ask the question whether you have a right to publish it. If you do have the right to publish it and it is the truth then you should have a legal defence. When in doubt about defamation I would personally always seek legal advice. There is also the argument of defamation suppressing free speech.
'The law of defamation is supposed to protect people's reputations from unfair attack. In practice its main effect is to hinder free speech and protect powerful people from scrutiny.'
http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/defamation.html
Another area that the chapter touched on was how defamation law reform has been on the national agenda since 1978. This is one area that needs to be address. The following article I have provided a link for is interesting to note that the same problems are still arising in 2007.
One of the consequences of Australia's fragmented defamation laws is the capacity of plaintiffs to engage in "forum shopping". Even though, for example, an alleged defamation might be published in a Melbourne newspaper, a sufficient degree of publication interstate is deemed that normally enables a litigant to head for an interstate court. A plaintiff can sue where the chances of a favourable verdict and the highest damages are most likely.’
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/11/16/1068917668644.html?from=storyrhs
Chapter 13
1. What do media companies need to do in relation to convergence before that can expect their journalists to work in converged newsrooms?
Before media companies decide to converge the newsroom they need to provide journalist with adequate training to work across the various mediums. Media companies should consider a wide range of aspects that will affect journalists due to convergence such as having the skill level to work across the various mediums.
2. What would be the likely outcome if someone, who just wanted to work as a print journalist because they would be nervous on television, was told by the company they worked for that they must report for television as well as print?
Grin and bear it. Today in the journalism field, journalists are increasing expected to be multi skilled. A journalist will always have their strengths and weakness. The likely outcome for this journalist would either they would have to adapt or find somewhere else to work that just focuses on print journalism. Today to further ones journalism career it would be beneficial if they were multi skilled and could adapt to various mediums.
3. Is journalistic convergence just a trendy fad that will run its course then be forgotten about?
When the Internet was introduced, was it just a trendy fad, defiantly not! Just like the Internet, convergence is here to stay. Media companies are converging to cater for consumers. Convergence is a response to consumers’ demands.
5. If you had crystal ball, what would it tell you about the future of radio, television, and the web?
In the future radio, television and the web will continue to play a vital role in the way each medium delivers news. I do not think any of the mediums would be phased out, now with the introduction of digital radio and television. The Internet will continue to grow and delivery of news will be more efficient.
6. Should the idea of multi skilling be integrated into every course in university journalism studies? Why?
Mult-skilling is the future for journalist, so yes I think it would be an important area to integrate into university studies. It would educate students on the issues and skills involved in the area of multi-skilling. However, I do think the fundamental writing skills should take priority, as these skills are an essential factor in journalism.
7. Is society getting to a point where life as we know it could not survive without the Internet and web?
Only for people who rely on the web and Internet to undergo their daily functions, which is the majority of society. For some people the Internet is vital to their studies and careers. The Internet allows society to preform daily functions that would otherwise require them preform face to face or over the telephone. The Internet cuts out the middle.
Chapter 17
1. You are a newspaper editor. One of your reporters has made an honest mistake that defamed someone. You publish an apology. The person defamed is not satisfied and wants you to print a full-page feature story promoting her business or she will sue. What will you do?
I would first try and compromise with the person and hopefully we could reach some agreement. If not I would weigh up the options in taking into factor what decision would result in a bigger lose for the newspapers.
2. Would you support a ‘public figure’ defence for the media that would sharply limit the rights of public figures, ranging from premiers to cricketers and rock stars, to take out defamation suits against the media? Why?
I have mixed feelings on this question. In one why yes, because 'public figures' should understand that being a 'public' figure they are constantly going to be in the eye of the media, so they have to accept positive and negative news. On the other hand defamation cost a whole lot of money. But to keep it safe I would say no because there needs to be some limits with respecting public figures.
3. You have promised a confidential source that you will not identify her. However, you discover that what she told you is untrue. Your newspaper is sued for defamation. You try to contact the person but she has vanished. Do you reveal her identity in court? Why?
Yes, it seems that I got the shorter end of the stick. The fact that she told me was untrue doesn't leave her with a leg to stand on. However I would not go publicising it, as I would still want my other sources to trust me.
Journalism Issue
The key issue to focus on within these reading is defamation. I think point to remember is that when reporting on someone, report the truth minus you opinion. Also ask the question whether you have a right to publish it. If you do have the right to publish it and it is the truth then you should have a legal defence. When in doubt about defamation I would personally always seek legal advice. There is also the argument of defamation suppressing free speech.
'The law of defamation is supposed to protect people's reputations from unfair attack. In practice its main effect is to hinder free speech and protect powerful people from scrutiny.'
http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/defamation.html
Another area that the chapter touched on was how defamation law reform has been on the national agenda since 1978. This is one area that needs to be address. The following article I have provided a link for is interesting to note that the same problems are still arising in 2007.
One of the consequences of Australia's fragmented defamation laws is the capacity of plaintiffs to engage in "forum shopping". Even though, for example, an alleged defamation might be published in a Melbourne newspaper, a sufficient degree of publication interstate is deemed that normally enables a litigant to head for an interstate court. A plaintiff can sue where the chances of a favourable verdict and the highest damages are most likely.’
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/11/16/1068917668644.html?from=storyrhs
WEEK 12- Chapter 12 'Broadcast Journalism: the world's town crier'
WEEK 12- Chapter 12 ‘Broadcast Journalism: the world’s town crier
1. Do you think the ABC should be privatised? What impact might this have on broadcast journalism? If you disagree, could the government funding process be made less ‘political’?
Although the government controls the content of programs and provides the funding for the ABC I personally feel that it should not be privatised. The debate continues that due to the ABC being government owned they consequently control what issues journalist cover. I do not want another television channel similar to ten, prime or NBN. As long as there is politics involved funding will always be ‘political’. Also the argument if ABC was privatised it would be less bias in their content is crap because the commercial channels are biased in what content is covered.
2. You are a television news director with two strong job applications. One is form a ‘telegenic’ male, 28, with reasonable skill experience. The other is from a female, 38. She is of ‘average’ appearance but has considerable skill experience. Your present reporting staff consists of four females and one male, none older than 32. Who do you hire, and why?
I would choose the male and the reasons why to give him the opportunity to build his career profile. Another reason would be to balance the female ratio to male TV presenters. As shallow as it sounds that fact that he is ‘telegenic’ would be more likely to attract audience viewers.
3. Given the strengths and weakness of each medium, which do you think is the ‘best communicator’ on any given story: radio, television, the web, or newspapers?
I think the various mediums have their strengths and weakness. If it were ground breaking story that day, you would listen to the radio for the convenience and efficiency or Internet. Later that day the television would provide the visuals and the following day the newspaper would reiterate the story. I would say the web and radio would provide the speed that allows viewers/listeners to know news updates constantly.
4. During the last federal election campaign do you think the broadcast media focused more on issues or personalities? What could have been done better?
The last federal election campaign focused more on personalties rather than issues. Broadcast media has made the focus on less important aspects of the campaign such as the worm rather than policies. No let me rephrase there has been lots of news coverage on policies I just don’t remember do to more entertaining news such as Kevin’s drunken strip night. I think there should be more attention paid to policies rather than personalities and stunts.
Journalism Issue
The journalism issue taken from the reading that I found interesting was reporting for television. Television reports are highly visual therefore newstories are reliant on captivating images. Televisions must be appealing to the audience in terms of their voice and looks. Having clear and articulate language is a must. I think broadcast journalism in 3rd year will give an insight to what the basic fundamentals when reporting in front of a camera. It would also be interesting to learn how a routine story is turned into a standout story due to visuals. Also how the current changes in technology are impacting and expanders a TV reporter’s job.
1. Do you think the ABC should be privatised? What impact might this have on broadcast journalism? If you disagree, could the government funding process be made less ‘political’?
Although the government controls the content of programs and provides the funding for the ABC I personally feel that it should not be privatised. The debate continues that due to the ABC being government owned they consequently control what issues journalist cover. I do not want another television channel similar to ten, prime or NBN. As long as there is politics involved funding will always be ‘political’. Also the argument if ABC was privatised it would be less bias in their content is crap because the commercial channels are biased in what content is covered.
2. You are a television news director with two strong job applications. One is form a ‘telegenic’ male, 28, with reasonable skill experience. The other is from a female, 38. She is of ‘average’ appearance but has considerable skill experience. Your present reporting staff consists of four females and one male, none older than 32. Who do you hire, and why?
I would choose the male and the reasons why to give him the opportunity to build his career profile. Another reason would be to balance the female ratio to male TV presenters. As shallow as it sounds that fact that he is ‘telegenic’ would be more likely to attract audience viewers.
3. Given the strengths and weakness of each medium, which do you think is the ‘best communicator’ on any given story: radio, television, the web, or newspapers?
I think the various mediums have their strengths and weakness. If it were ground breaking story that day, you would listen to the radio for the convenience and efficiency or Internet. Later that day the television would provide the visuals and the following day the newspaper would reiterate the story. I would say the web and radio would provide the speed that allows viewers/listeners to know news updates constantly.
4. During the last federal election campaign do you think the broadcast media focused more on issues or personalities? What could have been done better?
The last federal election campaign focused more on personalties rather than issues. Broadcast media has made the focus on less important aspects of the campaign such as the worm rather than policies. No let me rephrase there has been lots of news coverage on policies I just don’t remember do to more entertaining news such as Kevin’s drunken strip night. I think there should be more attention paid to policies rather than personalities and stunts.
Journalism Issue
The journalism issue taken from the reading that I found interesting was reporting for television. Television reports are highly visual therefore newstories are reliant on captivating images. Televisions must be appealing to the audience in terms of their voice and looks. Having clear and articulate language is a must. I think broadcast journalism in 3rd year will give an insight to what the basic fundamentals when reporting in front of a camera. It would also be interesting to learn how a routine story is turned into a standout story due to visuals. Also how the current changes in technology are impacting and expanders a TV reporter’s job.
WEEK 11- Chapter 11 ‘Reporting for duty’
WEEK 11- Chapter 11 ‘Reporting for duty’
1. You are a police reporter for a major city newspaper. A young man who seems credible tells you that he has been bashed by an off-duty police officer. He has a witness and a medical report. A police officer tells you that no one will speak to you again if the newspaper runs anything, regardless who writes it. The chief-of-staff says that if you do not write the story you will be removed from the round. What do you do?
Write the story, serve and protect the publics’ interest. The issue of the police not speaking to me is one I will deal with later but the chances are there will always be someone who will leak vital information.
2. A distraught woman convicted of stealing a pair of stockings from a store approaches you after her court case and says that she will commit suicide if you publish anything. Your newspaper has a policy of publishing all such cases, but it will never know about this one unless you reveal it. You really believe the woman might be suicidal. What do you do? Why?
First of all I will notify a clinic or mental health facility about the woman’s situation. I will then publish the story and I would not reveal the woman’s identity to protect her from harm or harming herself. But I highly doubt a woman convicted of stealing a pair of stockings would be newsworthy or would it? I mean who steals a pair of stockings?
3. A very famous and very attractive personality gets hopelessly drunk at a party, causes chaos, and on the way home is picked up for drink-driving. You get a tip from a police contact and attend court where the personality is convicted of being three times over the limit, fined, and disqualified from driving. You are the only journalist in court. The personality later phones you and begs you not write the story because it will ruin their career. They are so desperate they offer everything from sex to money and a free holiday if you do not report on the case. What will you do? Why?
I can earn my own money, pay for my own holiday and sex would not be an issue. As a famous person they have to take on the burden of the fact that they will constantly be in the media and public arena. If the story is newsworthy and in the publics’ interest then I would publish it. I am a strong believer in that if a person is famous then they have to accept good press and bad press. ‘For example, Paris Hilton, Ben Cousins, Lindsy Lohan and Andrews Johns have all been culprits of similar situations.
4. Although it is against the law, a juror in a high profile murder trail approaches you and say there will be a hung jury in the case because two jury members have accepted bribes of $100, 000 each from two corrupt high-ranking police officers who have paid the money on condition that the jurors do not return a guilty verdict. What will you do? Why?
Report the story, it’s a similar situation as question number one. It is in the publics’ interest to know and be informed about corruption within the justice system. As a journalist I would deal with the legal ramifications, as it is more important to let the public know when justice is not being served.
Journalism Issue
There were a couple of issues that the chapter addressed that I found to be practical and useful. Being informed- this is just informing yourself daily with the news and current affairs throughout the day. A journalist has to be proactive with listening, reading and watching from different mediums. Contact Book- the contact book is a journalist’s bible, the reporter’s lifeline to the community. Contacts should not be underestimated. Skills that are ideal and would benefit a journalist are: computer skills, ability to touch type (120 words per min) and knowledge of the newspapers telephone system. The ideal file-includes past news clipping, media releases, these represent story ideas or an update for a previous story. Coping the stress and time management were the last two useful points. Stress and time management go hand in hand and does not matter what you do in life both will occur. But to excellent time management skills will minimise stress.
1. You are a police reporter for a major city newspaper. A young man who seems credible tells you that he has been bashed by an off-duty police officer. He has a witness and a medical report. A police officer tells you that no one will speak to you again if the newspaper runs anything, regardless who writes it. The chief-of-staff says that if you do not write the story you will be removed from the round. What do you do?
Write the story, serve and protect the publics’ interest. The issue of the police not speaking to me is one I will deal with later but the chances are there will always be someone who will leak vital information.
2. A distraught woman convicted of stealing a pair of stockings from a store approaches you after her court case and says that she will commit suicide if you publish anything. Your newspaper has a policy of publishing all such cases, but it will never know about this one unless you reveal it. You really believe the woman might be suicidal. What do you do? Why?
First of all I will notify a clinic or mental health facility about the woman’s situation. I will then publish the story and I would not reveal the woman’s identity to protect her from harm or harming herself. But I highly doubt a woman convicted of stealing a pair of stockings would be newsworthy or would it? I mean who steals a pair of stockings?
3. A very famous and very attractive personality gets hopelessly drunk at a party, causes chaos, and on the way home is picked up for drink-driving. You get a tip from a police contact and attend court where the personality is convicted of being three times over the limit, fined, and disqualified from driving. You are the only journalist in court. The personality later phones you and begs you not write the story because it will ruin their career. They are so desperate they offer everything from sex to money and a free holiday if you do not report on the case. What will you do? Why?
I can earn my own money, pay for my own holiday and sex would not be an issue. As a famous person they have to take on the burden of the fact that they will constantly be in the media and public arena. If the story is newsworthy and in the publics’ interest then I would publish it. I am a strong believer in that if a person is famous then they have to accept good press and bad press. ‘For example, Paris Hilton, Ben Cousins, Lindsy Lohan and Andrews Johns have all been culprits of similar situations.
4. Although it is against the law, a juror in a high profile murder trail approaches you and say there will be a hung jury in the case because two jury members have accepted bribes of $100, 000 each from two corrupt high-ranking police officers who have paid the money on condition that the jurors do not return a guilty verdict. What will you do? Why?
Report the story, it’s a similar situation as question number one. It is in the publics’ interest to know and be informed about corruption within the justice system. As a journalist I would deal with the legal ramifications, as it is more important to let the public know when justice is not being served.
Journalism Issue
There were a couple of issues that the chapter addressed that I found to be practical and useful. Being informed- this is just informing yourself daily with the news and current affairs throughout the day. A journalist has to be proactive with listening, reading and watching from different mediums. Contact Book- the contact book is a journalist’s bible, the reporter’s lifeline to the community. Contacts should not be underestimated. Skills that are ideal and would benefit a journalist are: computer skills, ability to touch type (120 words per min) and knowledge of the newspapers telephone system. The ideal file-includes past news clipping, media releases, these represent story ideas or an update for a previous story. Coping the stress and time management were the last two useful points. Stress and time management go hand in hand and does not matter what you do in life both will occur. But to excellent time management skills will minimise stress.
WEEK 10- Chapter 10 ‘The story factory’
WEEK 10- Chapter 10 ‘The story factory’
1. A confidential source has tipped you off about what could be the story of the year, but they would prefer you to wait a day to write it. The source admits another media outlet might have it too. You feel you need at least two days on it to do a good job. But it’s been a slow news day, and if you tell the chief-of-staff, you will be expected to write it to the best of you ability today. What do you do?
I would wait as I would prefer to write the story to the best of my ability and more accurate. Also I would not want to offend my source, sources a very important as they are valuable for key information. I would take the risk hoping the other media source has not published it.
2. After a tip from an inside source you work on an article about filth in the kitchen of a major resort, which has allegedly resulted in several, guests and staff becoming ill. In the final stages of preparing your article you seek comment from the resort’s manager, who is hostile and refuses to comment. A short time later you receive a phone call from a leading public relations practitioner who tells you that the resort has been losing money and any bad publicity would force it to close with the loss of 120 jobs. Your source is one of the people who could be out of work. What will you do? Why?
This is a hard decision, one aspect it is not just 5 people losing jobs but 120 people losing their jobs. But it is still important and your duty to report issues that put the publics’ safety at risk. Therefore I would write the article before the situation gets any worse and puts other peoples’ health at risk
3. You are the late sub-editor for a daily newspaper. It is nearly10pm. A man who identifies himself as a solicitor rings and says that a judge issued an order, after the journalist departed, prohibiting publication of a defendant’s name. He sounds drunk. The story, with the defendant’s name, is on the front page, which is about to be sent to the press. There is no time to call anyone without delaying the production process. What do you do?
What can you do! The question really gives you no option as the paper is about to be printed and it is too late to make changes. The fact that a so-called drank ‘solicitor’ told you couldn’t be very reliable.
4. You are a junior journalist and you find yourself caught in the middle of an argument between the editor, who wants you to take one angle on a crime story, and the police rounds reporter who says the editor does not understand the full implications of the story and you should take a totally different angle. What will you do? Why?
I would look at both angles and analysis whose angle I think is the appropriate angle to take. I would also approach a senior editor and ask their opinion. On one aspect I should listen to the editor, as they are in charge however people are sometimes wrong. I would run with the round reporter’s angle, if the penalties I occurred had little affect on me.
Journalism Issue
I always find the debates against PR practitioners quite entertaining (as I am majoring in PR). The book refers to a PR as a ‘spin doctor’, these negative connotations do not bother me the slightest. ‘PR officers, especially those who work for government and big business, are paid large sums of money to hide the truth from the public’. However it is one of the fastest growing industries and in many nations it is outnumbering journalists. Could this mean journalists are a dying breed and more journalist are relying on press releases to formulate stories? Undertaking intro to journalism and PR was beneficial in my opinion as it taught me the views that journalism and pr have on each other. I think journalism and pr go hand in hand, we need each other, why not create more sources. I think Sally White sums the relationship up well a ‘mixed blessing’. It will be interesting to see what the future holds for the PR and journalism profession, whether it results in PR being a fad, journalism roles diminishing or the growth of working together.
1. A confidential source has tipped you off about what could be the story of the year, but they would prefer you to wait a day to write it. The source admits another media outlet might have it too. You feel you need at least two days on it to do a good job. But it’s been a slow news day, and if you tell the chief-of-staff, you will be expected to write it to the best of you ability today. What do you do?
I would wait as I would prefer to write the story to the best of my ability and more accurate. Also I would not want to offend my source, sources a very important as they are valuable for key information. I would take the risk hoping the other media source has not published it.
2. After a tip from an inside source you work on an article about filth in the kitchen of a major resort, which has allegedly resulted in several, guests and staff becoming ill. In the final stages of preparing your article you seek comment from the resort’s manager, who is hostile and refuses to comment. A short time later you receive a phone call from a leading public relations practitioner who tells you that the resort has been losing money and any bad publicity would force it to close with the loss of 120 jobs. Your source is one of the people who could be out of work. What will you do? Why?
This is a hard decision, one aspect it is not just 5 people losing jobs but 120 people losing their jobs. But it is still important and your duty to report issues that put the publics’ safety at risk. Therefore I would write the article before the situation gets any worse and puts other peoples’ health at risk
3. You are the late sub-editor for a daily newspaper. It is nearly10pm. A man who identifies himself as a solicitor rings and says that a judge issued an order, after the journalist departed, prohibiting publication of a defendant’s name. He sounds drunk. The story, with the defendant’s name, is on the front page, which is about to be sent to the press. There is no time to call anyone without delaying the production process. What do you do?
What can you do! The question really gives you no option as the paper is about to be printed and it is too late to make changes. The fact that a so-called drank ‘solicitor’ told you couldn’t be very reliable.
4. You are a junior journalist and you find yourself caught in the middle of an argument between the editor, who wants you to take one angle on a crime story, and the police rounds reporter who says the editor does not understand the full implications of the story and you should take a totally different angle. What will you do? Why?
I would look at both angles and analysis whose angle I think is the appropriate angle to take. I would also approach a senior editor and ask their opinion. On one aspect I should listen to the editor, as they are in charge however people are sometimes wrong. I would run with the round reporter’s angle, if the penalties I occurred had little affect on me.
Journalism Issue
I always find the debates against PR practitioners quite entertaining (as I am majoring in PR). The book refers to a PR as a ‘spin doctor’, these negative connotations do not bother me the slightest. ‘PR officers, especially those who work for government and big business, are paid large sums of money to hide the truth from the public’. However it is one of the fastest growing industries and in many nations it is outnumbering journalists. Could this mean journalists are a dying breed and more journalist are relying on press releases to formulate stories? Undertaking intro to journalism and PR was beneficial in my opinion as it taught me the views that journalism and pr have on each other. I think journalism and pr go hand in hand, we need each other, why not create more sources. I think Sally White sums the relationship up well a ‘mixed blessing’. It will be interesting to see what the future holds for the PR and journalism profession, whether it results in PR being a fad, journalism roles diminishing or the growth of working together.
WEEK 9- Chapter 9 ‘Interviewing, a core skill’ & Chapter 14 ‘Computer Assisted Reporting’
WEEK 9- Chapter 9 ‘Interviewing, a core skill’ & Chapter 15 ‘Computer Assisted Reporting’
Chapter 9
1. Which would you choose: a direct quotation that is accurate but unclear and embarrassing to the speaker, or one that is clear but inexact and makes the speaker appear more eloquent than he or she really is?
I would choose the direct quotation that is accurate but unclear and embarrassing to the speaker. An accurate quote holds more value than an inexact quote. The speaker should generally be aware when speaking to a journalist in that everything they say can be used against them.
2. Is it ever justified for a journalist to intimidate a source with a threat of ‘public exposure’ to get important public information?
Intimidation is never justified unless the public is at threat. People in general may feel intimidated by a journalist. I would try and avoid intimidating a source at all costs because I could put my reputation on the line and it can take one incident to ruin a reputation.
3. Is it reasonable strategy for a journalist-male or female- to use ‘personal chemistry’ to get information from sources when there is public interest at stake?
‘Personal chemistry’, could be taken in many different contexts. As long as the journalist’s feels they have not crossed the boundary by acting unethically and the strategy of ‘personal chemistry’ is used in a tactful way. Personally I wouldn’t go and use this strategy, as I feel disrespectful to myself even if it is just flirting, you should never get personally involved with a source. It is similar to a doctor/patient relationship.
4. What potential dangers could come back to haunt a journalist who gets too close to a source?
There could be many outcomes; readers may feel the stories written in relation to the source could be biased. There could be legal, personal and career ramifications.
5. Who is the most inarticulate, word-mangling public figure regularly in the news at present? Should you feel sorry for them and clean up their direct quotes or let them stew in their own frying pan?
Public figures should always be clear and conscious as they are obviously always in the media. I would not feel sorry for them, as they need to learn to be clear and direct. Public figures that are usually in the media and targeted for appearing inarticulate are usually the politicians such as Bush and Howard. The chaser is dedicated to probing at public figures that make word-mangling remarks or speeches.
Chapter 15
1. You are about to graduate with a degree in journalism. You have taken web writing, digital photojournalism, and CAR courses as well as completing a newspaper internship. There are two job offers. One is form a small but finical stable weekly newspaper several hours from capital city. The other is from a new online publication based in your capital city. It offers almost twice the pay but will not give you more than a six-month contract. Which job will choose, and why?
I would choose the six-month job with the online publication. I think it would be beneficial to experience the new craze of the online sector. Twice the pay always sounds nicer and I would be able to build up contacts within my own capital city. Actually I am really sitting on the fence on this one. I would have to weigh up the pros and cons. If was going to work for the newspaper I would like the opportunity of reporting face to face with people and the fact that I would be less likely to sit at my desk all day, or would I?
2. Your newspaper does not have a policy on using quotations or paraphrasing from email interviews. A local politician tells you she will not consent to an interview with you on a crucial issue unless it is via email. You need both comments and factual information from her but suspect you won’t get the spontaneous, reactive comment and detail need by deadline with an email interview. What do you do?
I would first suggest to the politician would they be happy to conduct an interview via web cam, or microphone, or chat. If I email the questions to the politician the chances are they would not be as honest and open. If they decline to use the other interactive options then I would just use the email, as the newspaper does not have a policy on using quotations or paraphrasing.
3. While conducting a CAR search on the web you come across some information which clearly indicates that a story ‘written’ by a colleague was plagiarised from a website. What will you do?
I would approach my colleague and question them about it and I would also find out if this has happened more than once. If it has happened more than once I would report them to the editor, if it is there first offence I would warn them if this were to happen again I would report them, or any misconduct for that matter.
4. A person you know nothing about has sent you an email from a hotmail address saying they have information, which will bring the government down. The writer says they are on the run from the police, will only meet you at 2am on the bank of a river in an unpopulated area, and you must be alone. You reply to the email seeking more information and a telephone number. There is no reply. What will you do? Why?
Safety first. How connivent, they are on the run from the police, they want to meet at 2am in a secluded place. The fact there is also no reply has to make me wonder. I think I would show the email to who ever is in charge and ask them what they think but if it was up to me I would put my safety first I happen to value my life.
5. When searching the web for particular quotation attributed to Daniel Defoe and his book Robinson Cursoe you find six instances of the quote. Three of them say exactly the same thing, and the other three say exactly the same thing as each other but they are different from the first three. How will you decide which quotation, if either, is correct?
I would evaluate which source is more credible/reliable. I would also try and find the original source for the correct quotation.
Journalism Issue
Interviewing effectively is an essential skill for a journalist. A journalist needs to prepare thorough questions to ask their interviewee. Background research is important when interviewing a person, as you have to know what angle you want to take.' Dig deep for your questions so you get in depth answers, devise your angle, and build you interview around it.'Even ask your editor what they want so you can draft a set of questions. List the questions in a logical sequence; a good interview is structured well. It begins with straight forward questions, shifting to more in depth questions as the interview progresses. If the interview has a logical structure the simpler it is to follow. The preparation will give the journalist confidence and control over the interview.
I sourced tips from the following article.
http://www.concernedjournalists.org/node/237 ‘committee of concerned journalists’
Chapter 9
1. Which would you choose: a direct quotation that is accurate but unclear and embarrassing to the speaker, or one that is clear but inexact and makes the speaker appear more eloquent than he or she really is?
I would choose the direct quotation that is accurate but unclear and embarrassing to the speaker. An accurate quote holds more value than an inexact quote. The speaker should generally be aware when speaking to a journalist in that everything they say can be used against them.
2. Is it ever justified for a journalist to intimidate a source with a threat of ‘public exposure’ to get important public information?
Intimidation is never justified unless the public is at threat. People in general may feel intimidated by a journalist. I would try and avoid intimidating a source at all costs because I could put my reputation on the line and it can take one incident to ruin a reputation.
3. Is it reasonable strategy for a journalist-male or female- to use ‘personal chemistry’ to get information from sources when there is public interest at stake?
‘Personal chemistry’, could be taken in many different contexts. As long as the journalist’s feels they have not crossed the boundary by acting unethically and the strategy of ‘personal chemistry’ is used in a tactful way. Personally I wouldn’t go and use this strategy, as I feel disrespectful to myself even if it is just flirting, you should never get personally involved with a source. It is similar to a doctor/patient relationship.
4. What potential dangers could come back to haunt a journalist who gets too close to a source?
There could be many outcomes; readers may feel the stories written in relation to the source could be biased. There could be legal, personal and career ramifications.
5. Who is the most inarticulate, word-mangling public figure regularly in the news at present? Should you feel sorry for them and clean up their direct quotes or let them stew in their own frying pan?
Public figures should always be clear and conscious as they are obviously always in the media. I would not feel sorry for them, as they need to learn to be clear and direct. Public figures that are usually in the media and targeted for appearing inarticulate are usually the politicians such as Bush and Howard. The chaser is dedicated to probing at public figures that make word-mangling remarks or speeches.
Chapter 15
1. You are about to graduate with a degree in journalism. You have taken web writing, digital photojournalism, and CAR courses as well as completing a newspaper internship. There are two job offers. One is form a small but finical stable weekly newspaper several hours from capital city. The other is from a new online publication based in your capital city. It offers almost twice the pay but will not give you more than a six-month contract. Which job will choose, and why?
I would choose the six-month job with the online publication. I think it would be beneficial to experience the new craze of the online sector. Twice the pay always sounds nicer and I would be able to build up contacts within my own capital city. Actually I am really sitting on the fence on this one. I would have to weigh up the pros and cons. If was going to work for the newspaper I would like the opportunity of reporting face to face with people and the fact that I would be less likely to sit at my desk all day, or would I?
2. Your newspaper does not have a policy on using quotations or paraphrasing from email interviews. A local politician tells you she will not consent to an interview with you on a crucial issue unless it is via email. You need both comments and factual information from her but suspect you won’t get the spontaneous, reactive comment and detail need by deadline with an email interview. What do you do?
I would first suggest to the politician would they be happy to conduct an interview via web cam, or microphone, or chat. If I email the questions to the politician the chances are they would not be as honest and open. If they decline to use the other interactive options then I would just use the email, as the newspaper does not have a policy on using quotations or paraphrasing.
3. While conducting a CAR search on the web you come across some information which clearly indicates that a story ‘written’ by a colleague was plagiarised from a website. What will you do?
I would approach my colleague and question them about it and I would also find out if this has happened more than once. If it has happened more than once I would report them to the editor, if it is there first offence I would warn them if this were to happen again I would report them, or any misconduct for that matter.
4. A person you know nothing about has sent you an email from a hotmail address saying they have information, which will bring the government down. The writer says they are on the run from the police, will only meet you at 2am on the bank of a river in an unpopulated area, and you must be alone. You reply to the email seeking more information and a telephone number. There is no reply. What will you do? Why?
Safety first. How connivent, they are on the run from the police, they want to meet at 2am in a secluded place. The fact there is also no reply has to make me wonder. I think I would show the email to who ever is in charge and ask them what they think but if it was up to me I would put my safety first I happen to value my life.
5. When searching the web for particular quotation attributed to Daniel Defoe and his book Robinson Cursoe you find six instances of the quote. Three of them say exactly the same thing, and the other three say exactly the same thing as each other but they are different from the first three. How will you decide which quotation, if either, is correct?
I would evaluate which source is more credible/reliable. I would also try and find the original source for the correct quotation.
Journalism Issue
Interviewing effectively is an essential skill for a journalist. A journalist needs to prepare thorough questions to ask their interviewee. Background research is important when interviewing a person, as you have to know what angle you want to take.' Dig deep for your questions so you get in depth answers, devise your angle, and build you interview around it.'Even ask your editor what they want so you can draft a set of questions. List the questions in a logical sequence; a good interview is structured well. It begins with straight forward questions, shifting to more in depth questions as the interview progresses. If the interview has a logical structure the simpler it is to follow. The preparation will give the journalist confidence and control over the interview.
I sourced tips from the following article.
http://www.concernedjournalists.org/node/237 ‘committee of concerned journalists’
Sunday, August 12, 2007
WEEK 8- Chapter 8 ‘Small path, big story’
WEEK 8- Chapter 8 ‘Small path, big story’
1. Which type of story would you rather do and why: a) A ‘paper chase’ conducted entirely by computer and telephone that takes half the time it would have taken if you had left the office? B) A ‘paper chase’ involving visits to half a dozen government offices and in-person interviews that puts you under extreme deadline pressure?
I hate sitting on my ass, I have sat on my backside throughout uni so I’d prefer to take option B. Face to Face contact is an important part of journalism and how well you communicate. I also work better under pressure and there is the likely hood you would make more contacts/sources from option B. The story would also be more reliable and more satisfying to write.
2. Would you be willing to pursue a corruption investigation or an investigation into organised crime if it included many unpaid hours of extra work and personal risk?
Corruption and organised crime is always enticing. It is something I am personally interested in as long as it did not put my family at risk. I would be more inclined to do it as an investigative journalism piece. Also I would be more likely to pursue an investigation like this while I am young because it would be highly likely I would have fewer commitments in terms a family etc. Things such as the drug trade, underground-organised crime and the illegal prostitution trade are areas that I would definitely consider.
3. Would you be willing to act together as a unit with competing reporters at a media conference in an effort to get maximum information if it meant giving up your best question, which you had intended to ask privately after the conference?
I would be willing to work together with other reporters, as the most important thing is to inform the audience with the best possible story. If the chances of a more informative story for the public meant working with competitive reporters then I would not hesitate.
4. Who really owns government-held information: the government or the people? Why?
The government owns government-held information. But as a journalist you can obtain information through FOI, freedom of information act. If you undergo the right procedures for obtaining information through FOI then you should not have a problem, but just get your company to reimbursement you for expenses.
5. If you were assigned to report on the proceedings of a conference and you had to choose between attending different sessions being conducted at the same time, how would you decide which to attend?
I would research and evaluate which conference would be the most beneficial to attend before attending. If all the conferences had equal value in attending I would ask fellow colleagues to assist me in attending the other conferences for me. If not I would ask if I would be allowed to put a recorder in each conference room for reporting purposes.
Journalism Issues
The section in the chapter that I found most interesting was the topic of ‘Whistleblowers’. Whistleblowers are a valuable source for journalist as they generally contact the media when wrongdoing has occurred. However if not treated with care they could feel used and abused! A point that made me giggle was, ‘whistleblowers can become obsessed with their cause.’ A whistleblower reminds me a childish dobbing. However I am not undermining how valuable a whistleblower can be. http://www.whistleblowers.org.au/ The following website is Whistleblowers Australia. It even holds a conference and you become a member. If you look on the website under constitution there is an outline of the ACT that they fall under.
1. Which type of story would you rather do and why: a) A ‘paper chase’ conducted entirely by computer and telephone that takes half the time it would have taken if you had left the office? B) A ‘paper chase’ involving visits to half a dozen government offices and in-person interviews that puts you under extreme deadline pressure?
I hate sitting on my ass, I have sat on my backside throughout uni so I’d prefer to take option B. Face to Face contact is an important part of journalism and how well you communicate. I also work better under pressure and there is the likely hood you would make more contacts/sources from option B. The story would also be more reliable and more satisfying to write.
2. Would you be willing to pursue a corruption investigation or an investigation into organised crime if it included many unpaid hours of extra work and personal risk?
Corruption and organised crime is always enticing. It is something I am personally interested in as long as it did not put my family at risk. I would be more inclined to do it as an investigative journalism piece. Also I would be more likely to pursue an investigation like this while I am young because it would be highly likely I would have fewer commitments in terms a family etc. Things such as the drug trade, underground-organised crime and the illegal prostitution trade are areas that I would definitely consider.
3. Would you be willing to act together as a unit with competing reporters at a media conference in an effort to get maximum information if it meant giving up your best question, which you had intended to ask privately after the conference?
I would be willing to work together with other reporters, as the most important thing is to inform the audience with the best possible story. If the chances of a more informative story for the public meant working with competitive reporters then I would not hesitate.
4. Who really owns government-held information: the government or the people? Why?
The government owns government-held information. But as a journalist you can obtain information through FOI, freedom of information act. If you undergo the right procedures for obtaining information through FOI then you should not have a problem, but just get your company to reimbursement you for expenses.
5. If you were assigned to report on the proceedings of a conference and you had to choose between attending different sessions being conducted at the same time, how would you decide which to attend?
I would research and evaluate which conference would be the most beneficial to attend before attending. If all the conferences had equal value in attending I would ask fellow colleagues to assist me in attending the other conferences for me. If not I would ask if I would be allowed to put a recorder in each conference room for reporting purposes.
Journalism Issues
The section in the chapter that I found most interesting was the topic of ‘Whistleblowers’. Whistleblowers are a valuable source for journalist as they generally contact the media when wrongdoing has occurred. However if not treated with care they could feel used and abused! A point that made me giggle was, ‘whistleblowers can become obsessed with their cause.’ A whistleblower reminds me a childish dobbing. However I am not undermining how valuable a whistleblower can be. http://www.whistleblowers.org.au/ The following website is Whistleblowers Australia. It even holds a conference and you become a member. If you look on the website under constitution there is an outline of the ACT that they fall under.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)